Chicago Insurance Co. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentGlickstein, Judge
I would reverse and remand with direction to prorate the $10,000 between the two insurers.
Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 255 Ga. 166, 336 S.E.2d 237 (1985), gives no explanation or reasons of any sort why that court reversed what I now conclude to be a logical, reasonable decision by the trial and intermediate appellate courts, the latter decision being reported with the same style as the foregoing at 173 Ga.App. 844, 328 S.E.2d 737 (1985). Judge Pope wrote there:
The statute, OCGA § 33-7-11, provides no guidance for resolution…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Casualty Company v. Atlantic National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. EXECUTIVE CAR AND TRUCKSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Southern Home Insurance v. WilloughbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.