Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 4, 2008No. A-117 September Term 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

948 A.2d 587 (2008)

195 N.J. 51

Phyllis SINCLAIR, Joseph Murray and Robbie L. Traylor, Individually and for all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant-Appellant, and

Jane Does Distributors (1-50), Jill Does Manufacturers (1-50), Jack Does Pharmaceutical Advertisers (1-50), Jake Does Sellers (1-50), John Does Marketing Partners (1-50) and Joan Does Promoters (1-50), Defendants.

A-117 September Term 2006

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 22, 2007.

Decided June 4, 2008.

John Beisner, a member of the District of Columbia bar, argued the cause for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API