Rostain v. Guggenheim
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action to quiet title. There is no dispute as to the facts. On February 2, 1926, a bond was issued as a lien on the property in question pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730; Peering ’s Gen. Laws 1937, Act 8199, as amended). No payment of principal or interest was ever made on this bond and because of a default on the first payment the city treasurer *128advertised and sold the property in question and on September 2, 1927, issued a certificate of sale to the predecessor of the defendant Alexander Construction Company.
Municipal taxes on this property levied by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. AddiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Campbell v. WoolnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monheit v. CignaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Rostain v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944