Legal Opinion

State v. Wagoner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1959No. 721PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendant contends the evidence before the jury was sufficient to present the question whether the killing was unintentional — the result of an accident. The court did not charge the jury upon that feature of the ease. The Attorney General, on the ■argument, frankly conceded that if the evidence is sufficient to raise the issue of fact, whether the killing was accidental, the court’s failure to charge with respect thereto is reversible error. Special prayer for the instruction was not required. State v. Brady, 236 N.C. 295, 72 S.E. 2d 675; State v. Ardrey, 232 N.C. 721, 62 S.E. 2d 53.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
  3. State v. ArdreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. . KeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Ward v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API