Legal Opinion
In Re Mexico Money Transfer Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 22, 2000No. 98 C 2407, 98 C 2408PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PALLMEYER, District Judge.
In addition to the fee they charge for wire transfers of funds to Mexico, Defendants in these nationwide class actions collect the difference between the foreign exchange rate they charge their customers and the more favorable rate that Defendants themselves pay for pesos. In these consolidated actions, and a number of cases in other jurisdictions, Plaintiffs challenge Defendants’ failure to disclose the exchange rate mark-up to their customers. After months of discovery and negotiation, the parties reached settlements. They now seek this…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sulejman Nicaj v. Shoe Carnival IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- In the Matter of Mexico Money Transfer LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Klein v. Robert's American Gourmet Food, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In Re AT & T Mobility Wireless Data Services Sales Tax LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.