Pittsburgh v. Mella
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
City of Pittsburgh, appellee, instituted this action in assumpsit to recover the purchase price ($650) of real estate sold under a written agreement to Charles P. Mella and Anna Mella, his wife, appellants. Appellants demurred to the complaint averring that' the City’s title acquired by a tax sale in 1900 was not good and marketable or free and clear of encumbrancés. No testimony was taken; the facts were agreed upon.1 The court below overruled the demurrer and entered judgment in favor of the City of Pittsburgh. This appeal followed.
In 1870 Reineman and Dickson laid out…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hess v. WesterwickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Ross AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Beacom v. Robison Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Thompson v. FrazierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Meyers v. Manufacturers & Traders National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.