Nghiem v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING
CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Phillip Nghiem brings this putative class action against Defendants Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (“DSG”), and Zeta Interactive Corporation (“Zeta”) for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. §§ 227 et seq. (See Dkt. 33 [First Amended Complaint, hereinafter “FAC”].) Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of standing. (Dkt. 68 [hereinafter “Mot.”].) For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED.
II. BACKGROUND
N…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gross v. GG Homes, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Wilbor v. GG Homes, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022