Legal Opinion
Wallick v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1985No. 84-176PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners appeal from the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment’s affirmance of the Zoning Administrator’s interpretation that a clinic is not a “residential use” for the purpose of the District of Columbia Zoning Regulation which sets floor area ratios for commercial districts, 11 DCMR § 771.2 (1984). We hold that the Board’s order is not clearly erroneous or inconsistent with the Zoning Regulations as a whole, and affirm.
Petitioners, trustees of the property located at 2400 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., filed a request that the Zoning Administrator interpret 11 DCMR § 771.2 [§…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sheridan-Kalorama Neighborhood Council v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Citizens Committee to Save Historic Rhodes Tavern v. District of Columbia Department of Housing & Community DevelopmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lenkin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Unions, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Concerned Citizens of Brentwood v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kalorama Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kca v. BzaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007