Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Meztista
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 7, 2001No. 1991922PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CeCe Hylton sued Edward C. Meztista and Magic Media Division ("MMD"), a partnership, alleging breach of the partnership agreement and seeking a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting of the partnership profits. The Court of Civil Appeals stated the following relevant and undisputed facts:
"The following facts are undisputed: Hylton and Meztista had a partnership, MMD, which had an advertising account with a Delchamps grocery store. Pursuant to the partnership agreement, Hylton and Meztista would equally divide the profits MMD earned once expenses were paid. They also agreed to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- O'Neal v. O'NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Boohaker v. TrottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Farmers & Merchants Bank of Centre v. HancockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ray v. ALA. CENT. CREDIT UNIONSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnston v. First Union Nat. BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Buco Bldg. Constructors, Inc. v. MyrickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cochran Plastering Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Ross Bros. Construction Co. v. Markwest Hydrocarbon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Barnett v. QuinnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.