Legal Opinion

In Re Pierce

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 3, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

The appellant was convicted on a criminal charge in the municipal court of Bennington, and the conviction was affirmed at the last term of this Court. State v. Pierce, 103 Vt. 383, 154 Atl. 675. He now appeals from a taxation of costs made by our clerk at Bennington. The disputed items in the taxation are six in number, aggregating $18. Five of these are for “term fee and travel,” allowed at $3 per term; the other is for “attorney fee” at the May Term, also allowed at $3.

Subject to the qualification pointed out by Mr. Justice Taylor in Comstock’s Admr. v. Jacob, 89 Vt. 510, 96 Atl. 4, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  2. Comstock's Admr. v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  3. In re JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  4. State v. GuyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ForantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API