Cross v. Haldeman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Error to Lmormoe Qvrowt Oov/rt. Before Hon. B. H. Neely, Circuit Judge. The. Circuit Court had no right ;to issue a writ of attachment beyond its own county, and tbe defendant violated tbe rights of Moses Brown & Co., and their deriva-tire holders of the note sued on, by appearing to tbe suit and ■acknowledging the indebtedness.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice WatKINS
For the determination of the questions, argued on this writ of error, the case, as it appears upon the record, may be thus stated: The plaintiff, Cross, on the 4th of October, 1850, instituted suit against the defendant, Haldeman, in an action of debt, upon a note executed by him to Moses Brown & Co., or order, dated at New Orleans, on the 26th of March, 1846, and due six months 'after date, and by them assigned to the plaintiff, without recourse, the assignment being without date. The defendant pleaded, in substance, that on the 7th day of December, 1846, one 'William Byers, being a creditor…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Pine Bluff National Bank v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Phipps v. RieleyOregon Supreme Court · 1887