Legal Opinion

Roberts v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 15, 1978No. 2 CA-CIV 2800PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Appellant was recreation administrator in the Parks & Recreation Department of the City of Tucson and a permanent employee under the city’s civil service system. In February 1976, he was informed by his immediate supervisor and the department head that due to his performance and failure to follow and implement departmental policies, his termination was being considered. Subsequently an agreement was reached between appellant and the department head wherein appellant was to submit his resignation effective on May 31,1976, in exchange for the promise by his immediate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kelly v. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Phil Jacobs v. Ken Kunes and County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. City of Flagstaff v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Civil Service Com'n of City of Tucson v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Roberts v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API