Legal Opinion

Phil Jacobs v. Ken Kunes and County of Maricopa

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1976No. 75-3146PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before WRIGHT, CHOY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Kunes is the County Assessor of Maricopa County, Arizona. His office assesses property, collects some taxes, and handles motor vehicle licensing. The plaintiffs were employed in the Assessor’s office.

Kunes, in response to customer comments, issued a memo requiring that male employees wear their hair cut above the collar. Three employees complied. When the plaintiffs did not, they were suspended and eventually fired.

Plaintiffs thereupon brought a Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, action in federal district…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jake Sherman v. Seiko YakahiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Winston v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Abraham v. PekarskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Robert George Heath v. James W. ClearyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Gomez v. Pima CountyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API