General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Brackett & Shaw Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
The interest of the General Motors Acceptance Corporation does not appear from the reported facts but is assumed to be that of the vendor, since the petition alleges that the balance due on the purchase price is “payable at the office of the General Motors Acceptance Corporation, said corporation having financed the purchase of said car.”
Section 27 of chapter 216 of the Public Laws provides that “no lien reserved on personal property sold conditionally and passing into the hands of the conditional purchaser,” with certain exceptions not material to the present controversy, “shall be valid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ritchie v. MetcalfeWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co. v. ZenorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Terrell v. Andrew CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Hill v. McNicholSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1884
- Potter v. DooleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bank of Marlinton v. McLaughlinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
- Amoskeag Bank v. ChagnonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Tardiff v. M-A-C Plan of NESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Davis v. SheriffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Cornell v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Pellerin)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.