Legal Opinion

Davis v. Collins

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 30, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We think the cause of action on the note first maturing is saved from our six-year Statute of Limitations by the provisions of section 19 of the Civil Practice Act. (Laurencelle v. Laurencelle, 217 App. Div. 159.) We also think that both causes of action arose in Virginia within the meaning of section 13 of the Civil Practice Act (Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Lacombe, 84 N. Y. 367; Laurencelle v. Laurencelle, supra), but that they are saved from the operation of the Virginia statute, and, therefore, from the provisions of section 13 of the Civil Practice Act, by defendant’s absence from the State.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Laurencelle v. LaurencelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kots v. SachsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1945
  2. People v. ValcarcelNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1958
  3. Crisafulli v. ChildsNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API