Legal Opinion

Durham Coal & Iron Co. v. Bischel

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 5, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPortrum, J.

At the outset of the investigation of this case we are confronted with the following motion:

“Comes the defendant in error, Mrs. Fred Bischel, and moves to dismiss the plaintiff in error’s appeal and to affirm the verdict of the jury and judgment belo.w, or to remand this cause for issuance of execution, and as grounds therefor assigns the following:
“It does not appear from the transcript that there was either any minute entry of the filing of the motion for new trial herein, or that the motion for new trial was placed on the minutes, as is required in order to perfect an appeal, and hence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellis v. EllisTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mitchell v. KimbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  2. Schulman v. Ridley Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API