Legal Opinion
In-A-Floor Safe Co. v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1937No. 8215PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant in a patent infringement suit the right to file a counterclaim.
On December 18, 1934, appellee, Die-bold Safe & Lock Company, filed a complaint against the defendant-appellant alleging the ownership by plaintiff of letters patent 1,965,296, granted upon the application of one Miller, the patent being for a type of money chest or safe. The complaint alleged that defendant was infringing the patent and prayed an injunction and accounting.
The defendant answered on January 7, 1935, contesting the validity of the patent and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Johnston v. Ouachita Nat. Bank of MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nancy Anne Spangler v. United States of America, Appellant-Intervenor v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Switzer Bros., Inc. v. LocklinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- National MacHinery Company v. Waterbury Farrel Foundry and MacHine Company and Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- International Forwarding Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.