Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Blankenship

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 31, 1998No. 94-7158PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal from consolidated actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), we determine whether a federal pretrial detainee was subjected to unconstitutional conditions of imprisonment in a city jail. The district court granted summary judgment to the federal marshal, the wardens, and the correctional officers. We affirm because we conclude that all of the defendants-appellees are entitled to qualified immunity.

I. BACKGROUND

On September 12, 1991,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Al-Amin v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Belbachir v. County of McHenryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. William A. White v. William Berger, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  4. Utley v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  5. Decker v. Dunbar, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API