Wilson v. Blankenship
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal from consolidated actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), we determine whether a federal pretrial detainee was subjected to unconstitutional conditions of imprisonment in a city jail. The district court granted summary judgment to the federal marshal, the wardens, and the correctional officers. We affirm because we conclude that all of the defendants-appellees are entitled to qualified immunity.
I. BACKGROUND
On September 12, 1991,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Al-Amin v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Belbachir v. County of McHenryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- William A. White v. William Berger, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Utley v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Decker v. Dunbar, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.