Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Wisconsin Health Organization Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 29, 1993No. 92-2479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

The issue on appeal is whether Elsie M. and Albert J. Gordon were entitled to a "made whole" hearing pursuant to Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 106 Wis. 2d 263, 316 N.W.2d 348 (1982), before the trial court granted a default judgment against the tortfeasor and in favor of Wisconsin Health Organization (WHO), the Gordons' subrogated health insurance carrier. The trial court ruled that the Gordons were not entitled to a Rimes hearing. Based on Schulte v. Frazin, 176 Wis. 2d 622, 500 N.W.2d 305 (1993), a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision released after the trial court's…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Schulte v. FrazinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. SalterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Schulte v. FrazinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leonard v. DusekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API