Gordon v. Wisconsin Health Organization Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
The issue on appeal is whether Elsie M. and Albert J. Gordon were entitled to a "made whole" hearing pursuant to Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 106 Wis. 2d 263, 316 N.W.2d 348 (1982), before the trial court granted a default judgment against the tortfeasor and in favor of Wisconsin Health Organization (WHO), the Gordons' subrogated health insurance carrier. The trial court ruled that the Gordons were not entitled to a Rimes hearing. Based on Schulte v. Frazin, 176 Wis. 2d 622, 500 N.W.2d 305 (1993), a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision released after the trial court's…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Schulte v. FrazinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SalterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Schulte v. FrazinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leonard v. DusekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994