Legal Opinion

King Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for DeSoto County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

The plaintiff in error brought an action against the Atlantic Coast Line Eailroad Company to recover the amounts fixed by the statute for the failure of the railroad company to equip its fiat cars “with all proper and sufficient standards, supports, stays, strips, railing and other equipments and appliances necessary to *294hold and keep” lumber or timber being transported firmly in place. A demurrer to the declaration was sustained, and as the plaintiff declined to plead further final judgment was entered for the defendant. On writ of error the order sustaining the demurrer to the declaration…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. SimonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Garrison v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dutton Phosphate Co. v. PriestSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Davis v. Florida Power Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Coastal Petroleum v. American CyanamidSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Pennington v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API