Legal Opinion

People v. Pegenau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1994No. 96696, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

In this criminal matter, the Court of Appeals reversed defendant Robert Paul Pegenau, Jr.’s, jury conviction for unlawful possession of Valium and Xanax.1 We granted the prosecutor’s application for leave to appeal2 to determine: (1) the constitutionality of MCL 333.7403; MSA 14.15(7403) and MCL 333.7531; MSA 14.15(7531), that define the offense of possession of a controlled substance and place the burden of proving a prescription on defendant, and (2) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and for a new trial. Because we find that §§ 7403 and 7531…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. People v. BuckeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. DupreeMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. HermizMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. NimethMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API