Ware v. Dazey
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGriffiN Smith, C. J.
Appellant received a donation certificate. He complied with terms of act 138 of 1887, as amended 'by act 29 of 1891. More than 29 months after his certificate was issued, 2 and before he had submitted proof of improvements, the commissioner sold to appellee the lands described in appellant’s certificate.
Five questions are presented: (1) Did act 128 of 1933 amend act 29 of 1891 by reducing the continuous residential requirement of a donee from three to two years? (2) Was the state land commissioner required to give appellant notice and accord him a hearing before treating the donation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilkins v. MaggardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Hagerman v. MoonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Cutrell v. HooverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- McGee v. BaxterSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Waldon v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Miller v. Cache River Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Stow v. BurkesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943