Legal Opinion

Ware v. Dazey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 1940No. 4-6052PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffiN Smith, C. J.

Appellant received a donation certificate. He complied with terms of act 138 of 1887, as amended 'by act 29 of 1891. More than 29 months after his certificate was issued, 2 and before he had submitted proof of improvements, the commissioner sold to appellee the lands described in appellant’s certificate.

Five questions are presented: (1) Did act 128 of 1933 amend act 29 of 1891 by reducing the continuous residential requirement of a donee from three to two years? (2) Was the state land commissioner required to give appellant notice and accord him a hearing before treating the donation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. MaggardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Hagerman v. MoonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  3. Cutrell v. HooverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. McGee v. BaxterSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Waldon v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Miller v. Cache River Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Stow v. BurkesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API