Waldon v. Holland
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.
This appeal presents for answer the inescapable question whether Act No. 2 of the Special Session of the legislature in April, 1934, impairs the obligation of the contractual rights of the appellant. The chancery court held the act to be valid, and appellant challenges the decree.
The Facts
D. A. Holland, appellee herein, purchased sixty acres of land in Miller county from D. J. Holland in 1923. There was a mistake in the section number in the deed, but we consider the mistake of no consequence since a correction deed was later obtained. The lands became vacant in 1926 and forfeited to the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- McCune v. EssigSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Wood v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Walker v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Slinkard v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Robinette v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1987
- Rachel v. RachelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987