Legal Opinion

Wolf Metals Inc. v. Rand Pacific Sales Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 2016No. B264002PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

In the underlying action, the trial court entered a default judgment in favor of respondent Wolf Metals Inc., on its complaint against Rand Pacific Sales Inc. (RPS). Following efforts to enforce the judgment, Wolf Metals requested that the judgment be amended to name appellants Donald Koh and South Gate Steel, Inc. (SGS), as additional judgment debtors. The trial court granted the request, concluding that Koh was RPS’s alter ego and that SGS was RPS’s successor corporation. On appeal, Koh and SGS challenge the amendment to the default judgment. We conclude that pursuant to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Stonewall Insurance v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Switzer v. Wood, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. 21st Century Financial Services, LLC v. Manchester Financial BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  3. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Roger VieraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Carlson v. ClapperDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. E-Band Communications v. Nexxcom Wireless CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API