Legal Opinion

Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 22, 1994No. 92-3683PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELL, Chief Judge.

Appellant contends the trial court erred when it permitted appellee to defend a civil theft action and assert a counterclaim for breach of contract after appellee had been adjudicated guilty in connection with his plea of nolo contendere to a related criminal charge. We find no error and affirm.

David Cohen was employed as a sales representative for Starr Tyme, Inc., a wholesale shoe importer. Starr Tyme authorized Cohen’s use of a corporate credit card for business purposes and permitted him to charge personal expenses provided he reimburse the company. In January 1988,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Garron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. In the Matter of Harlan Charles Raiford, Ii. Harlan Charles Raiford, Ii, Debtor-Appellant v. Benjamin C. Abney, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Sokoloff v. SaxbeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. John S. Noell, M. D. v. Peter B. Bensinger, Administrator, Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Starr Tyme, Inc. v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Board of Regents v. TaborskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API