Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DELL, Chief Judge.
Appellant contends the trial court erred when it permitted appellee to defend a civil theft action and assert a counterclaim for breach of contract after appellee had been adjudicated guilty in connection with his plea of nolo contendere to a related criminal charge. We find no error and affirm.
David Cohen was employed as a sales representative for Starr Tyme, Inc., a wholesale shoe importer. Starr Tyme authorized Cohen’s use of a corporate credit card for business purposes and permitted him to charge personal expenses provided he reimburse the company. In January 1988,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Garron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- In the Matter of Harlan Charles Raiford, Ii. Harlan Charles Raiford, Ii, Debtor-Appellant v. Benjamin C. Abney, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Sokoloff v. SaxbeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- John S. Noell, M. D. v. Peter B. Bensinger, Administrator, Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Starr Tyme, Inc. v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Board of Regents v. TaborskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994