Legal Opinion

Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 31, 1995No. 84060PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

659 So.2d 1064 (1995)

STARR TYME, INC., Petitioner,

v.

David COHEN, Respondent.

No. 84060.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 31, 1995.

Lauri Waldman Ross of Maland & Ross, Miami; and Bruce J. Benenfeld, Sunrise, for petitioner.

Joseph A. Murphy III, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.

KOGAN, Justice.

We have for review Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen, 638 So.2d 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), wherein the District Court certified the following as a question of great public importance:

WHETHER A DEFENDANT WHO PLEADS NOLO CONTENDERE IN A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IS COLLATERALLY ESTOPPED FROM SEEKING AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF OR…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. In the Matter of Harlan Charles Raiford, Ii. Harlan Charles Raiford, Ii, Debtor-Appellant v. Benjamin C. Abney, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Streeter v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Stogniew v. McQueenSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Far Out Productions, Inc. v. OskarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Murray v. Mariner HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. United States v. Robert William GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Verizon Florida, Inc. v. JacobsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API