Bruno v. DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Dissent
Because I believe that the Alabama court had the authority to suspend Bruno's license for 90 days, I must respectfully dissent. While I agree with much of Judge Crawley's dissent, I also feel compelled to address the issues presented by Bruno.
It is well established that an accepted plea of nolo contendere is equivalent to a final conviction for the purpose of suspending or revoking a driver's license. Wolfsberger v.Wells, 528 So.2d 854 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988); see also Ala. Code 1975, § 32-5A-195(i). Ala. Code 1975, § 32-5A-195(e), states:
"The Director of Public Safety is authorized to suspend or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Mechur v. DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETYCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Chambers v. DIRECTOR OF DEPT., ETC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.