Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bruno v. DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 25, 1995No. 2940393Published

1Dissent

Because I believe that the Alabama court had the authority to suspend Bruno's license for 90 days, I must respectfully dissent. While I agree with much of Judge Crawley's dissent, I also feel compelled to address the issues presented by Bruno.

It is well established that an accepted plea of nolo contendere is equivalent to a final conviction for the purpose of suspending or revoking a driver's license. Wolfsberger v.Wells, 528 So.2d 854 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988); see also Ala. Code 1975, § 32-5A-195(i). Ala. Code 1975, § 32-5A-195(e), states:

"The Director of Public Safety is authorized to suspend or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Mechur v. DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETYCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Chambers v. DIRECTOR OF DEPT., ETC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API