Legal Opinion

Ashby v. Cleaners Specialties, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 17, 1940No. 2883Published

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

This is a suit for alleged infringement of letters patent numbered 1,841,719 and 1,-855,544. The one is a device patent and the other is a method patent. The device is a means, as stated in the patent, “whereby trousers, when wet washed or otherwise cleaned, can be stretched to their natural width and length.”

It consists of an upright support with a head or arm extending from such support and equipped for multiple expansion and with such attachments as would enable the operator to stretch the leg of a pair of *86trousers longitudinally as well as laterally or transversely.

T…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Independent Oil Well Cementing Co. v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Electrons, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Jones-McLaughlin, Inc. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Moore v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API