Legal Opinion

Rackett v. Rackett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1940No. 27914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action for divorce on the ground of cruelty. To her amended complaint, defendant put in a general denial. The trial court entered judgment dismissing the action, from which plaintiff appeals.

Respondent has moved to strike the statement of facts and affirm the judgment on the ground that the statement of facts was certified within ten days after it was served and filed. From the record, it appears the statement of facts was filed on December 5, 1939. On the same day, appellant’s counsel gave notice to respondent’s attorney that he would call the statement up for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hersner v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Denison v. DenisonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Fetterley v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Stolz v. StolzWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Briggs v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Dau v. PenceWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Schmidt v. SchmidtWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Wing Central's Roadhouse Grill, Inc. v. Alfred W. Bucheli, et virCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API