Legal Opinion
Sherman B. Ruth, Inc. v. O.S v. the Marie & Winifred
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 4, 1957No. 53-69PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
The Marie and Winifred, having been libeled in this proceeding, was sold and the proceeds of the sale amounting to $4,-409.85 are in the registry of the court. These proceeds are claimed both by in-tervenor United States and intervenor Ernest J. Flood.
Flood’s claim is based on assignment to him of various maritime liens against the vessel. On March 22, 1952, he paid to one Chisholm a bill for $1,475.68 for repairs to the vessel and took an assignment of Chisholm’s lien against the vessel. On July 15, 1955, he paid to one Greenberg, doing business as Electro-Craft Co., the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. EttelsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- In Re HoldsworthDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- In re Baltimore Pearl Hominy Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yannicelli v. NashDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
- Wethered, Tr. v. Alban TractorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- In re Fidelity Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. v. ConnollyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Sherman B. Ruth, Inc. v. the O.S v. Marie & WinifredDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.