Legal Opinion
Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. v. Connolly
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 16, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-10714-JLTPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, Chief Judge.
This is an interpleader action brought by plaintiff Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Company, Inc. (“Smith Barney”) to resolve the competing claims of defendants United States and Jane Connolly to $361,824.00 (the “Interplead Funds”) currently held for de fendant Timothy Mclnerney in a Boston Smith Barney Account (the “Account”).
Presently before the court are the United States’ and Connolly’s cross-motions for summary judgment regarding the priority of their claims to the Interplead Funds. The court will also consider Smith Barney’s motion for attorneys’ fees and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Correspondent Services Corp. v. J.V.W. Investments Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. CompagnoniDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- SOUTH ADAMS SAVINGS BANK v. MartelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Landmark Chemicals, SA. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.