Standard-Vacuum Oil Co. v. United States

This case is before us on defendant’s motion for a new trial under Hule 54 (b) (5) and (6), or, in the alternative, for reconsideration of the order of the court entered on December 1,1953, denying the motion for a new trial.

It appears that on November 6, 1951, this court rendered an opinion (120 C. Cls. 518), in which it stated:

Caltex, Standard, and Shell are entitled to recover for the taking of their terminal facilities on Pandacan, and Standard is entitled to recover for the taking of its petroleum products on Cebu, the exact amounts being reserved for further proceedings under Rule 38…