Taber v. Pledger
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This is a gross receipts tax case in which the principal question is whether the taxpayer must pay all of an assessed deficiency before he becomes eligible to file suit for a refund. Appellant Bill Taber contends the tax should be regarded as divisible so that, if he has paid some of the deficiency declared by the commissioner for each month, or if he has paid all of the deficiency for any month for which the deficiency was assessed, he can bring a suit in chancery court to determine whether any tax should have been assessed. He also contends the assessment constitutes…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Samples v. GradySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Starnes v. SadlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- McCarroll, Commr. of Revs. v. Gregory-Robinson-SpeasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pledger v. Featherlite Precast Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Baker Refrigeration Systems, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Carson v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- McKinney v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Martin v. Couey Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.