Legal Opinion

Martin v. Couey Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1992No. 91-50PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

By this appeal we must decide whether the Chancery Court of Ashley County had jurisdiction to enjoin the appellant, as Director of the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, (ADFA) from proceeding under the Arkansas Tax Procedures Act to collect unpaid gross receipts (sales) taxes from Couey Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., appellee, on the sale of new automobiles. Couey maintains that an attempt by the ADFA to collect sales taxes from a party not responsible for their payment under law is an illegal exaction within the meaning of Ark. Const, art. 16, § 13. We hold…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pledger v. Featherlite Precast Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Samples v. GradySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Nelson v. Berry Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Brewer v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Harrison v. NortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. LeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Barker v. FrankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. McGhee v. Arkansas State Board of Collection AgenciesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Union Pacific RR Co. v. State Ex Rel. Faulkner Cty.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Tucker v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API