Legal Opinion
Bone v. Mahoney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2003No. 00-35913; D.C. No. CV-98-96-GF (DWM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner Robert Bone (“Bone”) pled guilty to a double homicide and was sentenced to 100 years imprisonment. He appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.
Bone first challenges the state court’s conclusion that he was not prejudiced by his counsel’s failure to investigate the effects of his Haldol medication, and, in particular, the finding that the Haldol did not negatively affect Bone.
The state court’s finding is not clearly erroneous. See Green v. White, 232 F.3d 671, 672 n. 3 (9th Cir.2000) (applying clearly erroneous standard…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Terry Allen Langford v. Rick Day, Acting Administrator of Corrections Division Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General of the State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Keith Daniel Williams v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Clyde Edwin SEIDEL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. W.A. MERKLE, Warden, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ferrara v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Fox v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2023