Ferrara v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. SUMMARY.387
II. FACTS.390
III. ANALYSIS.408
A. Summary of Analysis . 408
B. Ferrara Has Stated A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted And That Claim Is Not Barred By The Teague v. Lane Doctrine.410
C. The Reasonable Probability Standard Applies.421
D. Ferrara Was Denied Due Process And Is Entitled To Relief.423
E. Remedy.433
IV. CONCLUSION.440
V. ORDER.441
I. SUMMARY
This is the latest — and hopefully the last — in a series of related cases that have demonstrated extraordinary misconduct by the Department of Justice in its investigation and…
2Cases cited111 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ferrara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Castro v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Flores-Powell v. ChadbourneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Jimenez v. CronenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.