Garland v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Chief Justice.
The two issues before the Court in this case are (1) whether process was sufficiently served upon defendant in accordance with T.R.C.P. 4.04 and (2) whether venue was proper in the county wherein plaintiff’s action was maintained.
I
Plaintiff, Garland, a resident of Sullivan County, Tennessee brought suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S. C.A. §§ 51-60, against “Seaboard Coastline Railroad Company and Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, d/b/a Clinchfield Railroad Company.” Clinchfield Railroad Company is an unincorporated association comprised…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- American Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
- Insurance Co. of North America v. S/S "Hellenic Challenger"District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Semegen v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Hall v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Kevin Turner v. Stephanie D. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- McCracken v. Brentwood United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Pankow v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.