State Ex Rel. Wood v. Carlin, Judge
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTremain, J.
—This is an original action based upon the following briefly stated facts: There is now, and
has been for several years, pending in the Steuben Circuit Court, of which the respondent is judge, a bank receivership. The relator was duly appointed, and acted as attorney for the receiver. He filed with the receiver and in the Steuben Circuit Court a verified complaint or petition asking for an allowance of an attorney fee for his services rendered. Upon the filing of said petition, the respondent, as judge of said court, designated other attorneys to represent the receiver and to make defense to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Van Horne v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Burdge v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Lukemeyer v. Sumner, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Sup Ct. of Ind. Ex Rel. Rozplochowski v. BinghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kist v. BallIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Ray, Admx. v. Veneman, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Chambers, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Bell v. Miller, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Bamberger v. Nixon, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.