Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wood v. Carlin, Judge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1935No. 26,593PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTremain, J.

—This is an original action based upon the following briefly stated facts: There is now, and

has been for several years, pending in the Steuben Circuit Court, of which the respondent is judge, a bank receivership. The relator was duly appointed, and acted as attorney for the receiver. He filed with the receiver and in the Steuben Circuit Court a verified complaint or petition asking for an allowance of an attorney fee for his services rendered. Upon the filing of said petition, the respondent, as judge of said court, designated other attorneys to represent the receiver and to make defense to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Van Horne v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Burdge v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Lukemeyer v. Sumner, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Sup Ct. of Ind. Ex Rel. Rozplochowski v. BinghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kist v. BallIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State Ex Rel. Ray, Admx. v. Veneman, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Chambers, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Bell v. Miller, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Bamberger v. Nixon, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API