Legal Opinion

McCowen v. Pew

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1905No. S.F. No. 3182Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Hannon, Judge. The. facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant and an order denying plaintiffs' motion for a new trial. The plaintiffs being the owners of a certain tract of land in Mendocino County near Willits, on the sixteenth day of October, 1899, executed an agreement, as parties of the first part, and defendant J.W. Pew, as party of the second part, whereby "for value received by said party of the first part from said party of the second part, and to induce said party of the second part to undertake the disposition of said property, said party of the first part has granted unto said party of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sayward v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Thurber v. MevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Marshall v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API