Legal Opinion

Brush v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1975No. Civ. 43502PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON, J.

Petitioner Jack R. Brush sought a writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to compel respondents, the City of Los Angeles, Edward M. Davis, Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, and the Los Angeles Police Department, to reinstate him as a sergeant with the Los Angeles Police Department and to pay to him accumulated back salary. The trial court denied the writ and entered judgment for the respondents.

Since the judgment must be reversed for the reason hereinafter stated, we refer only briefly to the factual basis of petitioner’s termination from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Rigsby v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quintana v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Dawn v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Nicolini v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Barrie v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Lee v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API