Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Rainey, Ross, Rice & Binns

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1999No. 92,663PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOPLIN, J.:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Beth Ann Whitehead, executrix of the estate of Colleen Whitehead, along with Fred Blaylock and Barney Taylor, individuals and as representatives of unknown members of a class (individually by name, or collectively, Plaintiffs), seek review of the trial court’s order granting the motion to dismiss of Defendants/Ap-pellees Rainey, Ross, Rice & Binns and Gardner, Carton & Douglas (Defendants or Attorneys) in Plaintiffs’ action against Attorneys for professional negligence. Finding no reversible error in the trial court’s order, however, we affirm.

¶ 2…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kenneth E. Wildbur, Sr. v. Arco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, Local 35 v. Washington Star Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  5. Haney v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. R. Alexander Acosta v. Scott BrainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Cleveland v. Dyn-A-Mite Pest Control, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API