Foternick v. Watson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract for alleged breach of a contract in writing. Writ dated November 4, 1899. In the Superior Court Stevens, J. made the ruling stated in the opinion. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant; and the plaintiffs alleged exceptions.
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
In this case the jury were warranted in finding the following facts: The plaintiff Foternick is a builder by *188trade. He wished to construct some houses on a parcel of land on which there was a mortgage for $10,800. Before buying the land or otherwise entering upon the undertaking he applied to the defendant for what is generally known as a construction loan, and on April 13,1899, Foterniek and the plaintiff Lavinsky, in whose name Foterniek proposed to take title as a matter of convenience, entered into a written contract with the defendant, whereby the defendant agreed to lend "the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daniels v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Parker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Lowe v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Carpenter v. HolcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Scanlan v. GeddesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barrie v. QuinbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Leigh v. RuleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- New York Central Railroad v. StonemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Hawkes v. KehoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Beach & Clarridge Co. v. American Steam Gauge & Valve Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.