Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 12, 1986No. 519A85PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

By their assignments, the defendants contend that the trial court made several errors. The defendants first contend that the trial court erred by refusing to dismiss a juror for cause. They next contend that the trial court erred by permitting the State to introduce a pair of shoes that were seized when the defendant Steven Sanders was arrested. They also contend that the trial court erred by allowing the State to “death qualify” the jury.

The evidence presented at trial by the State tended to show, inter alia, that on 4 February 1985, Robert Wimberly was living in a mobile…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. MoseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API