Legal Opinion
Culkin v. Smith
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamohe, J.
The defendant, Clarence Smith, has moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint.
Smith was and still is a resident of the 'State of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff, Culkin, was the sole stockholder of Utica Uniform Company, Inc., whose principal place of business was located in Oneida County, New York. Utica Uniform Company, prior to February 11,1966, was indebted to the Marine Midland Trust Company of the Mohawk Valley in the sum of $75,000, as was the plaintiff, personally, by reason of having cosigned or indorsed the corporate promissory note guaranteeing payment of it.
In the month of January,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson Press v. . AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Bulkley v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Rosenkranz v. Schreiber Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Reeve v. CromwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Frosco Food Club Plan, Inc. v. DennisonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Healy v. BrotmanNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Blaine Personnel, Inc. v. Raymond Lee Organization, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Antonio Altimari, Inc. v. HochbergNassau County District Court · 1969
- Havlicek v. BachNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. v. ScalleatCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976