Frosco Food Club Plan, Inc. v. Dennison
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
In this action to recover a balance due under a written agreement alleged to have been assumed orally by the defendant, the evidence clearly indicates that the latter bound *242himself as a principal debtor primarily liable for the obligation here involved. Consequently, his promise does not come within the operation of the Statute of Frauds.
The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs to the plaintiff, and judgment directed for plaintiff in the sum of $484.15, with appropriate costs in .the court below.
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Culkin v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. Pell City Pipe & Foundry Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962