Legal Opinion

Shulkin v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

This is an action upon a policy of burglary insurance. The policy in terms required, in case a loss oc*161curred, that “Affirmative proof of loss or damage under oath” must be furnished on forms provided by the insurer containing among other things “(3) reasonable evidence of the commission of a burglary, as aforesaid, to which the loss or damage was due and of the time of its occurrence.” The insurance was confined to “Loss by burglary ... occasioned by any person or persons making felonious entry into the premises by actual force and violence when the premises are not open for business of which…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Howe v. National Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Tumblin v. American InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Jackson & Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Shattuck & Jones, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. O'Neil v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API