Legal Opinion
Welsh Manufacturing Company v. Sunware Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 9, 1956No. 310, Docket 23924PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff is the assignee of the Went-worth Patent No. 2,496,969, which relates to the manufacture of sun glasses and which consists simply in using a single piece of metal in constructing the top bracing bar and the sweat bar of the glasses. The bracing bar is fixed to and extends between the rims of the glasses, at their upper edges. Its purpose is to maintain the rigidity of the glasses. The ends of the bar are bent back and inserted into the sweat bar which is a celluloid piece intended to rest on the forehead of the wearer. The wire bar does not go all the way…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Slawson v. Grand Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Vermont Structural Slate Company, Inc. v. Tatko Brothers Slate Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Anton Lorenz v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Continental Can Company, Inc. v. Old Dominion Box Company, Inc. And Dacam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Tatko Bros. Slate Co., Inc. v. Matthew HannonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- E. J. Brooks Company v. Stoffel Seals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.