Legal Opinion

Churchill Downs, Inc. v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 1, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

This appeal presents the question of whether certain licensed pari-mutuel employees of appellant Churchill Downs become involuntarily unemployed at the conclusion of each of the two annual race meetings conducted by appellant, so as to qualify for unemployment compensation payable from appellant’s reserve account. The trial court adjudged that the employees are entitled to receive unemployment compensation payments from appellant’s reserve account. Appellant contends *348that the employees do not become unemployed in the circumstances, but even if they do, appellant’s reserve…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Dubinsky Bros., Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Missouri Ex Rel. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Kroehler Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  4. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  5. Kilgore v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Core Target City Youth ProgramCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Board of Education of St. Louis v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. STATE DEPT., ETC. v. Montgomery Baptist HospitalCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. McFadden v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  5. Murray Operation of the Tappan Co. v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API