Legal Opinion

IN RE TURKEY ANTITRUST LITIGATION

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 7, 2025No. 1:19-cv-08318Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case No. 19 C 8318 IN RE TURKEY ANTITRUST LITIGATION Judge Sunil R. Harjani MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Carina and Amory, two investment vehicles litigating this antitrust action as assignees of turkey purchasers, ask this Court to excuse their lateness in opt-ting out of the proposed Cargill settlement. Specifically, the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (DPPs) have reached a class settlement with Defendants Cargill, Incorporated and Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation (Cargill). On January 30, 2025, this Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. In the Matter of Oliver Plunkett and Monica Plunkett, Debtors. Appeal of Emerald Builders, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Ladmarald CatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Murphy v. EDDIE MURPHY PRODUCTIONS, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API