Legal Opinion

Connor v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1991No. 3-89-229-CR to 3-89-231-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice (Retired).

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant entered pleas of guilty before the court to three indictments charging him with the fraudulent sale of securities in violation of the Texas Securities Act, Tex. Civ.Stat.Ann. arts. 581-29(C)(1) (Supp.1991) and 581-4(F) (1964). 1 Punishment was assessed in each case at ten years’ confinement, probated. A condition of probation in the first numbered cause is that appellant pay restitution in the amount of $65,-179.08.

Appellant urges nine points of error, complaining in each of the three causes that the Texas Securities Act…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McIntire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. McMillan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Connor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Gant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Connor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API